Superior to Microrarrays
Eight good reasons to use SuperSAGE technology:
|
|
Microarrays Closed architecture platform |
SuperSAGE Technology Open architecture platform |
||
|
1 |
Only transcripts of genes spotted on the array can be detected |
Any transcript can be identified
|
||
|
2 |
Unable to detect novel genes |
Novel genes can be detected and analysed |
||
|
3 |
Limited to (supposedly) known genomes |
The transcriptome of any eucaryotic |
||
|
4 |
Rare transcripts* hardly detectable |
Precise quantification of even rare transcripts*
|
||
|
5 |
False positives due to cross-hybridisation
|
No false-positives, each transcript identified by a highly specific 26 bp tag sequence |
||
|
6 |
Measures semiquantitatve signal intensities only |
Counts SuperTAGs, produces exact transcript copy numbers |
||
|
7 |
Data analysis and interpretation ambiguous (strong environmental influences) |
No ambiguity in data analysis, independence of environmental influences (e.g. ozone)
|
||
|
8 |
Poor correlation between different microarray platforms (strong environmental influences) |
SuperSAGE library construction is standardized and highly reproducible
|
*Rare transcipts
Since 95% of all mRNAs are represented by only 1-5 copies per cell, most of this precious information is lost on microarrays. Below, the the distribution of more than 500.000 tags from a mouse study is shown. More than 75 % of the tags are rare (1-5 copies).




